The ontological argument st anselm and descartes both famously presented an ontological argument for the existence of god. Foremost among our modal headaches is anselm s ontological argument. It is supposed to show that god exists there are different versions, but they all argue something like. That distinction helps identify how the ontological argument commits the fallacy of equivocation.
Their versions of the argument are slightly different, but. Criticisms of anselms ontological argument the postbarthian. This video looks at some of the key ideas essential to understanding anselms argument in the proslogion. Having receded from the forefront of intellectual thought after being refuted by st. What everybody knows is wrong with the ontological. The one fatal flaw in anselms argument 439 gods existence, and another under which it is validand indeed soundbut fails to prove the existence of god. Anselm reasoned that, if such a being fails to exist, then a greater being namely. A good discussion with extensive links to the history, classification. As the philosophy of aristotle, and his muslim commentators, was introduced into the universities, it was seen as a threat to traditional christian belief. The mathematical form is a criticism of the ontological argument expressed through mathematical logic. The ontological argument from anselm and descartes, and challenges to it from gaunilo and kant for medieval theologians, the existence of god was a given there was no need to debate it. As clearly as possible, restate anselms ontological argument. Original german text available online, 628 kb pdf file, maintained by alain. The ontological argument for the existence of god was first framed in the proslogion of saint anselm of canterbury 10331109.
The final statement should probably go something more like people who accept the ontological argument probably except it because they are willing to accept that b and c are true, not because the argument itself is sound. Malcolm agrees with a tradition beginning with gaunilo in rejecting that argument. Pdf in this article i offer a new interpretation of saint anselms ontological argument. In the pages that follow, however, i only concentrate on what i take to be anselms argument in chapter 2. Anselms proof, known since the time of kant as the ontological argument for the existence of god, has played an important role in the history of philosophy and has been incorporated in various forms into the systems of descartes, leibniz, hegel, and others. For anselm, that system comes from his understanding of the christian.
Ontolgical argument is based on his definition of god that than which nothing greater can be conceived ttwngcbc. In the 11th century, saint anselm, the archbishop of canterbury, proposed the first and bestknown ontological argument for the existence of god. Anselm developed a controversial a priori argument for the existence of god. As philosophy ontological argument flashcards quizlet. I make a different proposal as to the nature of the single argument mentioned by anselm in the preface of p and, consequently, as to the overall plot of anselm s work. I suggest that actual and its more precisely, the words lewis has used to state the indexical theory are ambiguous. About the work although anselms argument for gods existence presented in this article is based on predominately on reason, anselm presents the argument as clari. The ontological argument is an idea in religious philosophy. He is most famous for his ontological argument, which is one of the most famous proofs for the existence of god in proslogium, as well as for his argument for satisfaction atonement in cur deus homo trans.
Anselms argument reconsidered lynne rudder baker and gareth b. Descartes ontological argument following on from anselms version of the ontological argument that we explored last time, we now move on to the version put forward by rene descartes. I shall devote special atten tion to one particular ontological argument, the most modest, since many of its features are shared by all other ontological arguments. Anselms text anselms ontological argument is presented in his proslogion, starting with chapter ii, though where the argument ends is more controversial. Critiques of ontological arguments begin with gaunilo. Anselm of canterburys ontological argument the postbarthian.
He has two versions of it, and they are the most widely discussed among the many versions of this argument. Ao1 a examine the ontological argument for the existence. Existing in both reality and in ones imagination is far greater than solely existing in ones imagination, therefore god must exist in reality. Wikipedias reprint from the scholarly 1911 encyclopedia britannica on anselms life and works anselm, the ontological argument a short selection of anselms argument from proslogium 2 in the online reading for philosophical inquiry on this site. The first, and bestknown, ontological argument was proposed by st. Ontological argument simple english wikipedia, the free. The idea is that existing makes a good thing better than one thats only imaginary.
Anselms ontological argument for the existence of god. Foremost among our modal headaches is anselms ontological argument. The ontological argument from st anselm, proslogium, trans. He exists in our mind as the gcb, but the gcb god in reality is unknown. Consider, for example, the claim that i conceive of a being than which no greater can be conceived. Essay about anselms ontological argument 680 words. But many philosophers are skeptical about this underlying assumption. Anselm wrote his proslogion as a prayer originally, but it later became an argument for god by establishing his attributes. The reasoning of the ontological argument, anselm argued, can legitimately be applied only in one very unique case. Anselm claims that we can prove the existence of god, without any evidence from experience, simply by understanding the conceptof god. The honor of being the first to present this argument fully and clearly belongs to saint anselm of canterbury 10331109.
Therefore, the reasoning of the ontological argument dodges the parody, its reasoning is not parallel to the parody argument, and it cannot be used to prove the existence of a lost island. Anselm had prayed for a single, short argument by which to prove almost everything. However, in our opinion, much of this literature ignores or misrepresents the elegant simplicity of the original argument. Anselm begins with a stipulative definition of god as a being than which no greater being can be conceived. This method of reasoning aims to demonstrate the truth of something by reducing to absurdity the very opposite of what you are aiming to prove. Anselms a prioriargument for the existence of god today we will look at anselms ontological argument for the existence of god. Matthews and lynne rudder baker the ontological argument in anselm s proslogion ii continues to generate a remarkable store of sophisticated commentary and criticism. Reprinted by permission of open court publishing company, a division of carus publishing company, peru, il. Peoples sense that one cannot argue for gods existence in the way anselm s ontological argument attempts to do so can be shored up with the help of aquinas wellknown distinction between three different acts of reason. The word ontological comes from ontology, the study of ology of what exists or being ont. Anselm of canterbury is most famous for his ontological argument for the existence of god, which is that god is the greatest necessary being that which may be thought of paraphrase. The one fatal flaw in anselms argument peter millican. Basically, if gods goal is to save all people, or at least as many people as he can draw to himself, then it would make sense that a. Notice that in this system 3 xn 3yy x is not merely consistent it is valid.
Anselms versions of the ontological argument descartes is not the first philosopher to state this argument. The ontological argument for the existence of god anselm of canterbury the ontological argument for the existence of god, as it is found in its classical form, was first formulated by the eleventh century benedictine monk, archbishop and theologian, st anselm of canterbury 10331109. Deity, then i call that argument an ontological argument. An ontological argument is an argument that attempts to prove the existence of. Hegel makes repeated assertions in these lectures that there is a successful ontological argument, though he nowhere says what the argument actually is. Despite his lack of recognition in this field in his own time, anselm is now famed as the originator of the ontological argument for the existence of god and of the satisfaction theory of atonement. This is an a prioriargument for the existence of god. For anselm, it is a perfection for god create all things from nothing proslogium, pp. Anselm presents a philosophical argument for the existence of god. In other words, ontological arguments are arguments from nothing but analytic, a priori and necessary actuaality to the conclusion that god exists. Anselms ontological argument for the existence of god anselms argument is an a priori argument. Although anselms argument for gods existence presented in this article is based on predominately on reason, anselm presents the argument as clarification christian faith.
Anselm uses reductio ad absurdum to prove the existence of god. Anselm 10331109 was archbishop of canterbury and wrote many influential works, including his proslogium, monologium and cur deus homo. Th is argument takes the form of a reductio ad absurdum. Although this argument has been presented as unassailable and irrefutable, there have been, however, some very important attempted refutations from very reputable and important scholars. Saint anselm, archbishop of canterbury 10331109, is the creator of the ontological argument. As is clearly evident, the ontological argument rests on the assumption that the concept of god, as it is described in the argument, is selfconsistent. Anselm ontological argument the ontological argument by. Explain the ontological argument from anselms perspective. In the present sense of this term, there are infinitely many ontologi cal arguments, all of them valid. The latin text, collated by hopkins and published in the foregoing work, is not here reprinted. Saint anselms ontological argument is distinctive from other arguments that attempt to prove that it is the existence of god, the creator, and not just some abstract entity that is being defined. If premise 1 is revised so as to be clearly true, and the rest of the ontological argument is modi.
Important variations occur in descartes, leibniz, spinoza, and hegel, and arguably in every rationalist theory of an absolute being. Anselm claims to derive the existence of god from the concept of a being than which no greater can be conceived. My aim is to demonstrate that the significance of this. The argument for the existence of god will always give rise to infinitive points of view. Ontological arguments stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.
The ontological argument necessarily presupposes a system of values. But it is the other argument with which malcolm is particularly concerned. Descartes and anselm show how the supposition that god does not exist leads to a contradiction, and they then conclude that god must therefore exist. A criticism of anselms ontological argument leaving. This is an a priori argument for the existence of god. And finally there is one more strong criticism where anselms argument fails. This casts doubt on the truth of premise 1 of the ontological argument. Anselms argument together with gaunilos, aquinas and kants objections are conveniently summarized by kenneth einar himma in the internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Anselm 10331109 of canterbury was born in aosta, italy.
The main opponent to this version was kant and we did deal with his objection last week due to the fact that the distinction between anselms. The heart of his argument is the insight that if god is defined as a being than which no greater can be conceived, then god. The philosophical consensus seems to be that the argument is hopeless. If you have a particular issue with anselms ontological argument, you will automatically disagree with what im proposing here and i should note that im not entirely sold on this argument either. A brief introduction and overview to anselms ontological argument. Three objections to the ontological argument, including the famous objection based on the dictum that existence is not a predicate. Anselms ontological argument is an ad hominem ar gument against the foole, part of which is a reductio ad ab surdum, designed to prove the existence of. Ian logan reading the proslogion1 saint anselm college. Matthews anselm s ontological argument in proslogion 2 has been discussed and criticized so much that it is hard for us today to see its basic structure. The ontological argument for the existence of god i. For anselm, it is a perfection for god to be passionless p. The ontological argument made by anselm was criticized by one of his contemporaries, a monk named gaunilo, who said, that by anselm s reasoning, one could imagine a certain island, more perfect than any other island, tf this island can exist in the mind, then according to anselm, it would necessarily exist in reality, for a perfect island. This entry is a good place to start for clarification of the above notes to the argument.
843 468 603 1566 632 243 243 274 1559 929 449 527 1191 255 972 1226 213 74 1084 1183 487 993 1552 435 1183 1426 77 134 1549 70 123 624 763 1384 544 135 314 458 533 1097 46 534 991 1006 35